1. What learning
have you inherited through this module and how effectively do you think you
have applied it? Consider differing approaches to contextual/professional
research
|
|||||
I think I have inherited more
of a sense of my taste in illustration throughout this module through, not
only the tasks that have been set for us to go off and find a set amount of images,
but through trying to remember to post regularly to my PPP blog practitioners
who I find interesting/inspiring.
I think research into the
professional world of illustration is better left as a natural process in
which you get lost looking at various sources of information and pick out
what is relevant to you. That’s why I found it hard to complete some of the
tasks in which we were forced to find really specific areas of illustration.
I was able to be more reflective when left to myself to find and post
illustrations I was into.
|
|||||
2. What approaches to image making have you
developed during this module and what informed such ways of working?
|
|||||
I have really developed my
ability to work on one sustained drawing for a period of time. My final
resolution was the result of several hours of intricate work that I
surprisingly did not find as tedious to complete as I thought I would. I went
back to using purely line with my brush pen for the first time in a long time
which I think was informed by a reflection on my year as a whole and wanting
to see how far my drawing skills had developed since the beginning; this
process was probably the best way to go about it.
I also think the vector Soul
Skate poster is a good example of my developed skill in using vector and
shape to create image. The fact that I was also able to incorporate line in
the drawing is a huge plus for me. This was definitely informed by some of
the shape-based artists I have looked at over the module.
|
|||||
3. What strengths can you identify in your practice
and how have/will you capitalise on these in the future?
|
|||||
I think that I have shown a
real strength in willingness to develop my work – after compiling work for my
slides in the PPP presentation, I realized just how varied some of my work was
for the year and all the different processes I had taken to making it.
I feel like I can capitalize
on this in second year by taking the processes, which I feel, have worked
really well or I have enjoyed doing and develop them and make them a bigger
or my integral part of my practice.
I also feel like I’ve become
really good at informing my practice through research, a skill which I
developed well in the COP module.
|
|||||
4. What weaknesses can you identify in your
practice and how will you address these in the future?
|
|||||
I think that I still have a
lot to learn in terms of composing illustrations and scenes. A lot of my work
this year has not really had much composition to it, and when it has, it’s
been quite weak. I think I can address this in future by spending more time
studying composition and producing thumbnails. I also need to be more
confident in diving in and making more composed illustrated scenes as I
currently find the task quite daunting.
|
|||||
5. Identify five things that you will do
differently next time and what do you expect to gain from doing these?
|
|||||
· I think maybe I will
try and produce a series of posters as I think the two posters I produced
(Soul Skate and Theo Parrish) are both really strong on their own, but have
left me thinking that they would work so well in a set.
· When initially
designing the image I will try and make sure that it fits to the format that
it will be printed at – this will mean that I won’t have to awkwardly find a
way to box my design within the poster as I had to for the Theo Parrish
piece.
· I think maybe I might
try and exploit the zine idea further. I have been saying to myself all year
that I want to make a zine, and while I did make a small one this module, it
could’ve worked in a set quite nicely.
|
|||||
6.How would you grade
yourself on the following areas:
(please indicate using an
‘x’)
5= excellent, 4 = very good,
3 = good, 2 = average, 1 = poor
|
|||||
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
Attendance
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
Punctuality
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
Motivation
|
|
|
|
|
x
|
Commitment
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Quantity of work produced
|
|
|
x
|
|
|
Quality of work produced
|
|
|
|
x
|
|
Contribution to the group
|
|
x
|
|
|
|
The evaluation of your work
is an important part of the assessment criteria and represents a percentage
of the overall grade. It is essential that you give yourself enough time to
complete your written evaluation fully and with appropriate depth and level
of self-reflection. If you have any questions relating to the self-evaluation
process speak to a member of staff as soon as possible.
|
Tuesday, 27 May 2014
OUIL402 End of module self evaluation
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment